1.2.2 The Analytics Edge - Video 2 Example 1 - IBM Watson

Our first example today is a story of IBM Watson. IBM research, a distinguished industrial laboratory, strives to push the limits of science. In the mid-1990s it created Deep Blue, a computer that beat Garry Kasparov, the world champion in Chess at the time, showing to the world that machines can beat humans in tasks that people thought were restricted to human intelligence. In the 1990s-- in the late 1990s-- it created Blue Gene, a computer to map the human genome. In 2005 IBM decided to create a computer that would compete at Jeopardy, a popular game show. From the T.J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, New York, this is Jeopardy-- The IBM Challenge. Please welcome back our contestants. He has never been defeated. And his winnings of more than $3.2 million make him Jeopardy's all time biggest money winner. From Los Angeles, California, here's Brad Rutter. An IBM computer system able to rapidly understand and analyze natural language, including puns, riddles, and complex questions across a broad range of knowledge, please welcome Watson. In 2004 he captivated America by winning 74 consecutive matches and $2.5 million on Jeopardy. From Seattle, Washington, here's Ken Jennings. And now here is the host of Jeopardy, Alex Trebek. Thank you, Johnny. Before we get into the game, there are just a couple of things I need to tell you about this match. Now as I said earlier, Watson will receive the clues electronically as a text file at the same moment the clues are revealed to Ken and Brad. And at the same time I read them. This competition will be a two game total point exhibition match. However, these two games will be played out over the next three days so we can tell the full story. Throughout the games you'll get a glimpse of the thinking process, if you will, that is behind Watson's responses. Now this will be done through an answer panel display at the bottom of the screen. Let's play Jeopardy. Here we go. Our first round of play contains these categories-- Literary Character APB, All Points Bulletin; Beatles People; Olympic Oddities; Name the Decade; Final Frontiers; and Alternate Meanings. A little while ago we had a drawing to determine which player would select first. Brad, you won that. So if you're ready make your first choice. Let's take alternate meanings for $200, Alex. Four letter word for a vantage point or a belief. Brad? What is a view? Yes. Alternate meanings, $400. 4-letter word for the iron fitting on the hoof of a horse or a card-dealing box in a Casino. Watson? What is shoe? You are right. You get to pick. Literary Character APB for $800. Answer the Daily Double. Now Watson, although you have but $400, you know of course that you can risk up to the maximum value of a clue on the board. And that is $1,000. $1,000, please. All right. Here is the Daily Double clue for you. Wanted for killing Sir Danvers Carew. Appearance pale and dwarfish. Seems to have a split personality. Who is Hyde? Hyde, yes. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, either one acceptable. You're now in the lead with $1400. Go again. Beatles People for $200. And any time you feel the pain, hey, this guy, refrain. Don't carry the world upon your shoulders. Watson? Who is Jude? Yes. Olympic Oddities for $200. Milorad Cavic almost upset this man's perfect 2008 Olympics, losing to him by one hundredth of a second. Watson? Who is Michael Phelps? Yes. Go. Name the Decade for $200. Disneyland opens and the peace symbol is created. Ken. What are the '50s? Yes. Final Frontiers for $1,000, Alex. Tickets aren't needed for this event, a black hole's boundary from which matter cannot escape. Watson? What is event horizon? Yes. Why is Jeopardy hard? Jeopardy asks the contestants to answer cryptic questions in a huge variety of categories. It is generally seen as a test of human intelligence, reasoning and cleverness. No links to the outside world are permitted. And new questions and categories are created for every show. Watson is a supercomputer with 3,000 processors and a database of 200 million pages of information. It has a massive number of data sources like encyclopedias, texts, manuals, magazines, Wikipedia, etc. IBM researchers who developed Watson used over 100 different analytical techniques for analyzing natural language, finding candidate answers and selecting the final answer. We'll discuss this more later in the class. In February, 2011, a two game exhibition match aired on television six years after the initial conception of the idea to build Watson. Watson competed against the best two human players of all time and challenged the meaning of intelligence. Now Watson is being used for many applications including selecting the best course of treatment for cancer. What is the edge in Watson? Watson combined many algorithms to increase accuracy and confidence. We'll cover many of them in this class. IBM approached the problem in a different way than how a humans does it. Watson deals with massive amounts of data, often in unstructured form, which is important as 90% of the data in the world is unstructured.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

12. Ion Implantation and Annealing - Analytic Models and Monte Carlo

JUDY HOYT: So before we start with today's formal lecture, there's a couple of things I want to talk about. One is the schedule, which I have shown up here. And you'll notice, or if you remember, I've actually shifted around one of the lectures. Here we are today, I think October 19. And we're supposed to have this lecture on the SUPREM-IV process simulator. I decided I wanted to do that lecture later, primarily because I want to have talked about transient enhanced diffusion and those effects. A lot of the examples I show and how to use SUPREM relate to transient enhanced diffusion. And I realized I hadn't really-- I wouldn't have introduced it. So we're going to have instead the ion implantation lectures. There's four on ion implantation, two of those are on TED, and then we'll do that lecture. And as I mentioned also because of the Red Sox game last night, I don't have homework number 4 ready to go out to you yet. And so we c...
Read more

L17.4 Molecules and energy scales

PROFESSOR: The molecules and Born-Oppenheimer approximation. OK, we all know that molecules are a lot harder to solve than atoms, and even atoms are not that easy once you have more than one electron because of the electrostatic repulsion, but molecules are significantly different in that one of the greatest simplicities that we had with atoms is that the atom is such that the potential created by the nucleus is spherically symmetric. When you have a molecule you have separate nuclei and therefore your spherical symmetry is gone, and whether you have one electron or more than one electron, there is no spherical symmetry. All our tools of angular momentum don't help us much. We have to start the problem anew. So the difficulty with molecules is basically that the potential for the electrons, where they move is not spherically symmetric. There is another thing that helps us, however, is that there's a nice separation of mass scales. You have the mass, little m, of t...
Read more

Lecture 20 Maxwell Theory and its Canonical Quantization

[SQUEAKING] [RUSTLING] [CLICKING] HONG LIU: So in the last lecture, we have concluded the discussion of fermions. And now, we go to the last missing piece before we can talk about the QED. It's how to quantize the Maxwell field, OK? How to get photon, OK? And so today, we start. OK? So this is a short chapter. I think we should be able to finish it just this week in two lectures. So first, let me just remind you of some aspects of the classical Maxwell theory. And then we will talk about this quantization, OK? So the Lagrangian, say, for the classical Maxwell theory can be written as-- Lagrangian density can be written as F mu nu. So F mu nu is just the standard-- partial mu A nu equal to partial nu A mu. And the J mu is just the electromagnetic current. OK. J mu just electromagnetic current. OK. And then so from this Lagrangian density, then you can derive the equation motion, which is just the Maxwell equation, OK? So the Maxwell equation is given by partial mu F mu...
Read more